Love is patient and kind...not demanding and nagging. |
|---|
| By Jalynn Yokairei |
|
Dear Parents, I fully understand the tremendous pressure of the Singapore's education system and your great love for your children, wanting them to excel and do well academically but life is so much more... I just wanna share this with you: Today, I met my ex-pupil's mum for lunch. She shared with me that her 17 year old son had passed away in August 2014. He had been unwell and having severe headaches. That fateful day, he went to school, fell and hurt his head... With relentless tears in her eyes, she poured out her heart... I listened and comforted as much as I knew how... it is indeed heartrending to lose a beloved son... and definitely not easy to let go... I hope that some parents can reflect and "repent" (in Hebrew, the word 'repent' means to change one's mindset). Every now and then, parents Whatsapp me about their multiple issues with their children, even those already studying in universities... e.g. behavioural problems, the lack of discipline, insolence, indolence, indifference, etc. Yet, after listening again and again to them, I usually concluded with this statement: You have "overly" loved your child/teen. (In other words, I was telling them, they had loved in the way they deemed right but not necessarily "right" and probably, in a narrow-minded way... that's the root cause of those issues they were facing.) Parents, if you are feeling stressed or even frustrated and unhappy... may I advise you this: please be mindful of what you are doing and saying to your younger ones every single day. As an educator for nearly 20 years, I have heard many pupils sharing with me about their high-level of stress in schools and at home... they groaned that their teachers stressed them up with a plethora of home assignments, and then, their concerned parents (usually mothers) kept on "pushing" them to do their work and to excel... nagging at them to study hard, to work hard... admonishing them not to do this... cannot do that... and/or preaching to them about having a good education is the only way to a better future. Before you have something to comment, let me share with you some students I have come across all these years... A Primary 4 pupil
"Teacher Jalynn, I really feel like committing suicide... life is so stressful... my parents are always quarrelling... my mum is always nagging..." A Primary 6 pupil
"Teachers pressure us... go home... more pressure from my mum... endless pressure from everywhere. I know she loves me but she simply doesn't understand..." I can list down hundreds of other feedback I have heard from students of different backgrounds... (affluent families, average, typical middle-class and those from deprived, indigent or broken homes) "Nagging"
Children and adolescents... rich or poor... they have something in common. None can tolerate a nagging person. If nagging works, let's continue to do so... but it has never worked, as far as I know... Parents, can you please learn to love with an open mind... as much as you want your children to learn and excel... we, adults gotta learn some things too. Why are there so many unhappy children and teens in our country? Is it the faults of MOE, the school teachers, society or parents? Well, there isn't a need to pinpoint who's right or who's wrong... just accept whatever it comes and live to the fullest every day. "Threats"
If you truly love your children, pls stop saying, "If you don't do this or that... you will lose out... if you don't study hard, you will fail... if you don't finish your work, you will not get this or that..." "Condemnation"
Worse, if you are one of those that say, "You will never do well... don't waste my time and money... you never study hard enough... you never... you never..." A simple question for you to ponder: If your child received 3/10... would you focus on the +3 or the -7? A truly encouraging and wise parent would say or joke, "It's ok if you have done your best... at least you got 3 marks... surely you can do better the next time. I believe in you and I love you... not your results." Do you know that we all grow up healthier and happier (both mentally and physically) when we know that we are deeply loved by our parents and even teachers etc.? What do I mean by "deeply loved"? In my own definitions: Love is patient and kind... love gives no condition... love is not authoritative nor demanding, expecting another to do just our way(s)... love is enduring... not unmannerly... love always lifts up... And Learning should be a joyful experience, not one that feels coerced... we cannot achieve effectual learning out of someone (young or old) by force... we can only use edifying, gentle, positive affirmative words, fun-loving parenting/teaching style to help the younger ones to learn what they need. Fears, guilt and condemnation are the greatest enemies anyone can have... do not ever speak words to inject such negative, killing emotions into your kids (even spouse and others)... Don't wait till you lose a child (in whichever way) to say, "If I have known... I would... if only I knew... I would..." There's no turning back to yesterday... nor any need to worry about the future. Just live for the present, to the fullest. Love your children as much as you can but stop seeing yourself as the authoritative figure, trying to control their lives... Guide them well, step by step... commune with them as good friends do... be there always no matter what kind of results they get... The roads are theirs... you cannot dictate them to walk the paths you want them to... even though you may think yours are better ways... You are not almighty God... lean not unto your own understanding, learn to see different perspectives while you watch your children grow up to be excellent people (whole and sound). In conclusion, I would like to reiterate this: Love is patient and kind... not demanding and nagging. ** Pardon me for such a lengthy letter... just sharing from the bottom of my heart for your sake and your children's. This first appeared as a response on the Facebook wall of PSLE Parents 2015. Do join in the discussion over there if you have thoughts to share. |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: Why do we do this to our children? A good school is one that our kids can fit in and enjoy going to everyday. |
Chemistry
- Mrs Grace Ong
- Mr William Lin Xijie
- Mr Joel Liu
- Mdm Rajeshwari Rai
- Mr Desmond Tan
- Mr Donnell Koh
- Mr Prakash Philip
- Mr Heng ✻
- Mr Julian Tan †
- Mr Chew
- Mr Dion Khoo
- Mr Max Lye
- Dr Aw Junxin
- Mr Ingel Soong
- Miss Ong Li Hui
- Miss Serene Ow
- Miss Foo Ee June
- Mr Edwin Cheng
- Mr Kevin Seah
- Dr Michael Fong
- Mr Koh Kian Leon
- Mr Jim Cheong
- Mr Daniel Ong
- Mr Irwin See ✻
- Mdm Shiao Lea Yap
- Dr Choo Yan Min
- Mr Liau Chuan Yi
- Mr Timothy Chia
English /
General Paper /
Creative Writing
Physics
Biology
- Mr Duncan Ang ✻
- Dr Michael Fong
- Miss Rachel Mohd
- Mr Alex Tsui
- Ms Yap
- Mr Karman Chua
- Miss Serene Ow
- Miss Foo Ee June
- Mr Kevin Seah
Literature / Humanities / Social Studies
Mathematics
- Mr Tan Jun Wei
- Mr Andrew Tan
- Mr Eric Chng
- Miss Jolyn Ang
- Mr Goh Joo Heng
- Mr Andrew Yap
- Miss Tan Su Ping
- Mr Jim Cheong
- Ms Debbie Teo ✻
- Mr Li Minghui Samuel
- Miss Cai Liling Clarice
- Mr Ang Wei Cang
- Mr Jerry Guo Jiayu
- Mr Raymond Ng
- Mr Alvin Au Meng Jun
- Dr Choo Yan Min
- Mr Ingel Soong
- Miss Tan Su Ping
- Mr Philip Toh
Principles of Accounts
Economics
This is a heading title
Public Opinions/ Perspectives
Listen To What They Say
Read These At Least Once
- • Things To Consider
Before / After Hiring
A Tutor
- • DIY For Tutors
- • Cut-off Point Tables
(Secondary / JC)
- • P1 Registration Balloting History
Academic Knowledge Base
Feeds From Around The World
Local Feeds
Local NTU student questions why foreigners enjoy better lives than him |
|---|
| By Angry Singaporean |
|
My son finished National Service last year and entered Nanyang Technological university (NTU)’s Engineering 2nd year program as he was a polytechnic graduate. He has been staying in the hostel and interacting with most of his foreign friends. For many years he has been apathetic towards politics and was rather pro-PAP like his mother and always felt I was too negative and even xenophobic. In the last 6 months it seems his views have been challenged and his support for PAP is wavering, though he is still too proud to admit it. He has begun to question and discuss with his NTU Singaporean friends the consequences of importing too many folks from other countries. Now he realizes that these foreigners enjoy scholarships, free boarding and meals plus $400 monthly allowances while his Dad does not have CPF and has to fork out cold hard cash for his tuition fees and personal expenses. He even lamented that his sterling NS contribution as a combat fit officer meant little to our government. For the first time, he felt like a 2nd class citizen in his own country where he was once proud to serve and protect with his life!!! Sometimes, it must hurt us so very intimately before we become acutely aware of the political implications. He has come a long way to even say that we now badly need an opposition in politics to check excessive pro-foreigners policies and told me a lot of his friends who will be voting for the first time have decided to vote against PAP simply because of their vested personal interests as they hear more and more horror stories of PMETs being retrenched and driving taxis. He admits he has little confidence in his future working as an engineer with the PAP as government and doesn’t want to be a 2nd class engineer on top of being a 2nd class citizen. I am thankful at least NTU has really given my son a true education by means of an explicit negative demonstration day in and out. This was reproduced with permission from editors of The Real Singapore. |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: Gen Z workers: “Companies are not ready for us” What Millennials Need to Know About Paying for their Own University Education Our children's future - a reality check |
Bilingualism – are we really made for it? |
|---|
|
By Lyn Lee My relatively monolingual close relative has a strong theory about bilingualism – that our system is unfair because most humans are just not wired for it, especially if the two languages are disparate in origin. So when I came across this recently published article in The New Yorker, it set off a few thoughts. This researcher found a “systematic bias in the field against reporting negative results” leading to “a distorted image of the actual study outcomes on bilingualism, with researchers (and media) believing that the positive effect of bilingualism on nonlinguistic cognitive processes is strong and unchallenged.” An interesting insight, though it might be a common observation to those more familiar with academic circles (and the pressure to publish certain views). Perhaps it was just ‘cooler’ to extol the positives from speaking two languages (whilst sending monolingual parents worldwide into a tizzy), rather than to honestly reveal that research findings were non-conclusive either way. But I suppose for us Singaporeans, the debate goes beyond whether bilingualism enhances “executive function”. Well and fine for Americans who queue up to emplace their kids in Boston hot-house preschool language centres, only to realise they have been marketed what may largely be hogwash, but the stakes are slightly higher for those of say, Chinese or Mexican ethnicity, since there is the emotive issue of ‘roots’, or ‘rootedness’ to one’s ethnic origins. In Singapore, there is a school of thought, held mostly by those who were educated in Chinese schools (or whose parents were). Namely, that we teach our children Mandarin not because of its economic value, or the rise of China which may increase the pervasiveness of Mandarin as a global language of business and learning. Our children need to be conversant and schooled in the Mandarin language at the least (and in Chinese history and literature if possible), because they are Chinese. Other Singaporeans hold fast to the position that our real ‘mother-tongue’ from cradle to grave is English (or Singlish, if you must), and thus it goes against logic to insist fluency in another ‘mother-tongue’, especially if their etymology is as unrelated as English is from Mandarin. For Europeans to be multi-lingual in languages that are close in etymology (English and German) is a much less arduous learning process. Not everyone is gifted in languages, so the odds do indeed seem stacked up against the proportion of Singaporean kids who are not, but nonetheless expected to do well in two disparate languages. Since increasingly, most Singaporeans speak English at home, my close relative has even gone to the extent of proclaiming that “I am not Chinese, I am Singaporean. Why do I need to speak a word of Chinese in my entire life?” Okaaaaaay… I wouldn’t go that far, but I guess we get the point. Personally, I do have a love for the language (credit goes to my primary school friends and good Mandarin teachers in secondary school, given that my parents don’t speak it to me), since I think it is beautiful both in form and in tone. There is something about the language, that allows certain thoughts and emotions to be expressed in a lyrical way that the English language simply cannot, or rather, can only do so very differently. And there is something very fascinating about the thousands of years of Chinese history, since geographically what we know as China today, was one of the cradles of civilisation. I love languages, and find it interesting to learn them. But people who don’t, say that I feel this way possibly because I have an innate aptitude for them. And that I should not then think that it’s easy for every kid to pick up two very different languages, and understand how very painful it could be. However, I am less decided as to whether or not genetic makeup obliges one to learn the language. Those involved in race research often quote how skin colour is after all only determined by a tiny proportion of our genes, 0.1% to be exact. And why should some melanin dictate what language I should call my ‘mother-tongue’? Some parents who have adopted children from other countries, e.g. a British national who adopts a Chinese child, might send their kid for lessons to learn their ‘native language’ as a means of connecting with their ethnic origins. But by and large, children speak the languages their parents speak, and possibly nowhere else in the world (apart from our sunny state) is it made compulsory for children to take exams in a language that their parents may hardly use. Nonetheless, that is the state (pun intended) that we find ourselves in. So I guess we make the most of it, and I do think that there is much to be gained (economics aside) from nurturing a love for Mandarin. So I guess, even if my girls don’t achieve complete mastery of the language, so long as they don’t hate it, and develop a positive interest in it, I would consider my job somewhat done. As opposed to drilling them so that they can write the words perfectly but hate the subject totally. That would be winning the immediate battle but losing the entire war, wouldn’t it? This post was first published over at Lil Blue Bottle on 26 January 2015. It is reproduced with permission. |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: 3 reasons your child should master Chinese The Problem With Singlish And Singaporean Education Higher Chinese And Its Implications |
Getting Into Shape |
|---|
|
By Kwan Jin Yao “In a speech highlighting 10 areas of concern, the NMP said it is worrying that young people do not enjoy sports and wondered if they participated in sports activities only to accumulate Co-Curricular Activities (CCA) points.” (Sports Facilities in Every School to be Opened to the Public: Lawrence Wong , Ian De Cotta) The announcement to open sporting facilities in every Singapore school to encourage mass participation in sports is welcomed, though it is less clear whether Minister of Culture, Community, and Youth (MCCY) Lawrence Wong did address the concerns raised by Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Ben Tan (TODAY, Jan. 20). The NMP had asked about the low rates of exercise among Singaporeans and the sentiment that young people do not enjoy sports, and while Minister Wong spoke generally on the sports programmes under ActiveSG and the physical education curriculum, the response could have been more rigorous. Some may quibble that public usage of these sporting locations may interfere with school activities or – quite hyperbolically – threaten the safety and wellbeing of schoolchildren, but the present facilities under the Dual-Use Scheme have worked out great thus far. For instance Minister Wong noted that “significant shifts have also been made to encourage more people to adopt sports as a lifestyle”, yet does not go into detail on the effectiveness of the ActiveSG initiative. How many more Singaporeans are now part of these programmes, and – more importantly – do they continue with their commitments in the long run? Updates collected by the MCCY show that exercise participation levels have risen above 60 per cent, a supposed improvement from 50 and 42 per cent in 2005 and 2011 respectively (figures from the National Sports Participation Survey), but the distribution across ages is not clear. Aggregated results from the National Physical Fitness Awards (Napfa) test can indicate the fitness of the general student population. Based on the latest National Health Survey, NMP Tan also referenced the increase in obesity levels from 6.9 per cent in 2004 to 10.8 per cent 2010. In the same study it would appear that the prevalence of obesity is consistent across the age groups, between the range of 10.6 and 12.3 per cent for those aged 18 to 59 years old. In this vein, besides working more intensely with the Ministry of Education on its revised physical education, sports development, and co-curricular recognition systems, the MCCY should assess the efficacy of its present offerings. Aggregated results from the National Physical Fitness Awards (Napfa) test can indicate the fitness of the general student population. In his question NMP Tan could only substantiate with anecdotes from two polytechnic lecturers, who estimated that “60 to 70 per cent of poly students would fail their [Napfa] test”. Such quantitative feedback can be coupled with on-the-ground discussions with students and working Singaporeans, to fairly ascertain MCCY’s endeavours to get more people to take up sports. This post was first published over at the blog of Kwan Jin Yao on 21 January 2015. It is reproduced with permission. |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: 10 worrying trends in Singapore’s sports culture Parents sending kids for ‘sports tuition’ |
Tuition In Singapore: A Different Perspective |
|---|
| By Darrell Tan |
|
My parents and I were featured in the Sunday Times on the 21st of December 2014. Asiaone placed the article online: Learning and teaching together While the article spoke about rather straightforward issues such as the fear of failure embedded in the minds of Singaporean students, reasons why we set up Edhome Learning Centre and how we worked together to set up this tuition business, it left out my responses to the tough questions the reporter posed.She asked why I left the service if I had a passion for teaching, whether I was adding to the pressure that students faced by contributing to this “tuition culture” in Singapore and how I felt about our education scene and the tuition industry. My response to these questions left me rather concerned about how controversial the article might have turned out, and while I do appreciate how the article was positively written and how my family was accurately portrayed concerning our values and beliefs, I feel compelled to speak up in with my response to the tough questions raised during the interview and other pertinent issues that have been deeply bothering me because of how one-sided the portrayals have been on tuition and education. In recent years, the impressions of the tuition industry have been more negative than positive. A reported 1 billion dollars spent on tuition per year, a feature of super-tutors and subsequent reports on how much certain tutors earn seemed to add up to a conclusion that private tuition is just a profit-making industry. Tuition has also been reported to perpetuate a “kiasu culture” in Singapore, adding to competition and the resultant stress heaped on our youth.Among these reports on tuition as a social phenomenon are the occasional reports on errant tutors falsifying qualifications and making false promises leading to the public and even MPs demanding for more scrutiny on the industry. Why teachers leave to become tutors Let me deal with the first hard issue. Why do good teachers leave the service if they claim “teaching is their calling”? Definitely, there are teachers who feel underpaid and leave, thinking that becoming a tutor would earn them more money(which really isn’t necessarily true). I am not speaking for these ex-teachers;neither do I think they ought to be viewed negatively. Reality is that many teachers are in the service because teaching makes a good and stable first job and they are able to deliver decent lessons. If money and a better life serve as reasons for leaving, it’s basically the same as anyone in any profession leaving because the grass is greener on the other side. I speak up in this open letter on behalf of teachers who genuinely love to teach - teachers who genuinely feel they’re “called” to teach, those who speak of young people with passion, care and concern - who move to become tutors. When we leave the service and end up in the tuition industry, it is with huge reluctance and much sadness that we leave, and it is not because of the money. Firstly, even these passionate teachers get disillusioned. Don’t get me wrong! We aren’t disillusioned with educating our youth, definitely not with the classroom (it’s probably what we love the MOST) and probably not even the “admin” that most teachers speak of (though it really is heavy). We are disillusioned with obstacles that lie in the way of real education –education that works, education that produces results AND at the same time develops character, encourages meaningful relationships and lead to real success (contentment and happiness!)down the road. Often times, this might be the result of circumstances within the school they are in – departments comfortable with keeping the norm, leaders who undermine the enthusiasm of young teachers, superiors who breathe down their necks and restrict creativity (and potential) or simply, injustice,politics or nasty people. Sometimes, it is the result of human weakness. It takes two hands to clap and these passionate, caring, good teachers make mistakes. We step on toes in the process of trying to achieve the best for students. We ruffle (old) feathers, and find ourselves in unnecessary conflicts with our counterparts we take absolutely no delight in. No one is perfect,and as a testimony to that, I made a few very stupid mistakes in my dealings with my colleagues and superiors in a bid to bash through walls of tradition and comfort zones to implement what I felt would really help students to learn and grow. This whole effort to help young people grow and succeed can actually blind teachers to the fact that colleagues (teachers), superiors (SHs and HODs) and even principals need to learn and grow, and that takes time. It blinded me for awhile until I was able to step back and evaluate where I went wrong, after I left the service (unfortunately). So yes, those moments of anger, frustration and weakness do result in good teachers leaving, and what better job to leave to, then to tutoring. My point here, is that yes, these teachers do leave because of circumstances at that point of time, but their hearts have never abandoned that desire to nurture and guide students to the best of their ability and we enter into tutoring,desiring to do just that. But what pains my heart to observe, is how we are no longer viewed as educators with a sincere desire to impact and nurture young lives, but instead, as profiteering individuals sometimes representing a profit-driven organization. I suppose, with huge tuition companies setting up multiple branches and attracting millions of dollars in investments, tutors are automatically associated with wanting to have a piece of the billion dollar pie. The cost of Tuition People forget that tutors need to survive. We too, suffer from a high cost of living and for those who own a small tuition centre like me, the overheads are high and we are struggling to cover cost. We cannot help but charge for classes. The windows for lessons are so limited, usually to evenings, or weekends. In addition, tutors - the ones whose heart have never left the ‘classrooms’, will not spend merely 1.5 to 2 hours on a class. Along with some tutors (I’m sure they exist), I’ve spent hours reading through materials from various schools and learning centres, gathering what works best, putting them together with the methods I find the most useful and packaging them into fresh notes. That is followed by doing up presentations and continual contemplation over what OTHER approaches or teaching methods would best benefit my students. “Rehearsals” for the delivery of these lessons take place while I’m driving, or even as I lie on my bed at night, to ensure that the lesson is well understood and engagingly delivered. Why does tuition seem to cost $200-300 for mere 8 hours of group tuition or up to $100+ per hour for 1 to 1 tuition? Ideally because so much more is done behind the scenes to make sure the child receives the best in that1.5 to 2 hours a week. That is not considering the hours spent thereafter marking work, giving feedback or lessons specially crafted for students of those 1 to 1assignments. Scrutiny of the Tuition Industry This inevitably brings me to how parents and students need to know what they’re paying for. Parents and students need to understand what is being done IN a tuition class, talk to the tutors at length, or even request to sit in to observe for part of a lesson. I know of tutors who would charge high prices just to get tutees to do work on the spot and ask them questions. I was shocked when my students told me that that was being done, and that several tutors do just that.Further, there are many tutors as well, who would work for a centre, and basically deliver a lesson based on the curriculum the centre provides. There is sometimes no real understanding of the lesson they are delivering and hence,effectiveness of those lessons is compromised. In fact, that is how many schoolteachers function – deliver a lesson found in the department folder or get students to ‘do work in class and ask questions when they need to’. Good teachers, in or out of the government service, in the school classrooms or intuition centres, will possess a deep understanding of the lessons delivered and endeavor to do so in the best possible way. Most of the time, if not all, these teachers will repackage curriculum to improve it, and fit it to their styles of delivery according to the profiles of their students. That is what all teachers and tutors should try their best to do regardless of experience or position. That has to be what parents are paying for in tuition – a good lesson, created with commitment, and delivered with heart. Only THAT justifies the prices they are paying for what seems like a mere 1.5 to 2hours of class time. That is why I feel there is value in signing your child up with smaller learning centres or private tutors. These tutors will not be able to hide behind popular brand names. The good and committed ones won’t bother hiding! If there is any closer scrutiny of the tuition industry, it has to be done by parents and students, and not the government. More ‘scrutiny’ by the authorities will only mean more paper work and red tape. Errant tutors will always have means to bypass these restrictions and along the way, good tutors suffer from the increased administrative load. Tuition and ‘Stress’ Moving on, good tutors are not necessarily miracle workers. All these promises of guaranteed results are often just marketing gimmicks and should not be the main focus. For every A1 or A star produced, another tutee probably got a B or a C. What is put up as marketing material is often selective and must be taken with a pinch of salt. An excellent lesson may result in students understanding those particular concepts taught within that particular lesson. But a passionate and committed tutor does more than that. Students potentially come out of lessons encouraged, motivated and determined to achieve much more on their own, on top of understanding what was taught. On a side note, I believe students should not be forced to attend tuition, especially if they insist it is not of use. It is tough enough for young people to spend mandatory hours in school for half a day, 5 days a week. It is harder for them to drag their feet into yet another classroom (where some disinterested tutors teach on monotonously). Tuition under these circumstances will only lead to more stress, fatigue and wasted time and money. It is fair however, for students’ to be encouraged to give tuition classes a try to see if it works for them. I have personally seen how tuition reduces stress rather than contributes to it. I have also seen students find a joy in learning instead of doing so just for results, purely because of tuition. This brings me to the ‘student’ part of things. Where does stress come from? Many students try so hard in class but they don’t ‘get it’. Sometimes, teachers in class just don’t care and students are made to struggle on their own. These teachers exist! There is no point denying it. Teachers all possess different capacities, and sometimes, they CAN’T care because of so much on their plate,and students suffer as a result. Often times, many teachers genuinely care and try very hard, but no matter how much they try, students don’t seem to take to their teaching methods very well, and no matter the hours of consultation,students still don’t get it, and they struggle. I’ve noticed how these students actually appreciate their teachers’ efforts, but they are usually resigned to how they are unable to understand what is going on in class. Teachers themselves are sometimes blinded by egos. What happens if a student looks for another teacher, does that mean you’re not good enough? Isn’t education meant to be open? Shouldn’t students be able to seek help from any teacher? It may sometimes just be that a fellow teacher explains a certain topic better than another. Both teachers may be good! What happens then, if students attend tuition? Do teachers then feel they are not good enough? Why can’t we be more open and acknowledge that everyone can potentially work together to help these young people? Many a times, students attend tuition and find that something clicks and everything suddenly makes sense. That in itself is extremely stress-relieving. Sometimes,students find suitable approaches to problem-solving because tutors have more time to specially craft lessons that suit their learning styles and profiles.That gives students the confidence to learn on in school. For languages and humanities, tutors are sometimes able to inject life and creative juices into the way students may pen essays and responses to open-ended questions as opposed to how most students in schools subscribe pretty much to a fixed way of doing things when we know “there isn’t a ‘correct’ structure to writing an argumentative essay” (for example). When a student discovers how his individuality and uniqueness (in writing) helps him to glow among standard essay responses,he is motivated to exercise more creativity in his work. For subjects like Literature, English Language and General Paper, tutors can offer different perspectives to current affairs and global issues from those of their schoolteachers, broadening students’ views and creating fresh interest. I also understand from my friends who teach Mathematics that sometimes, solving a difficult question comes down to looking at the sum from a different perspective, or using a different framework. That alternative approach or angle may very well come from a tutor. Working together: parents, teachers, students and tutors Let’s credit anything or anyone who helps young people learn better, more enthusiastically and more happily. It always seems as though tuition is something in excess,something more, and something that is an added burden to the already heavy academic load. Can’t tutors be seen as concerned stakeholders alongside parents, teachers and the student themselves instead of being perceived as‘extra’ or someone opportunistic and eager to make money from students in need or desperate parents? Perhaps then, tuition wouldn’t be seen as ‘added pressure’. When and if we recognize the ways to which good tuition can unlock or broaden minds, inspire or encourage hearts, then perhaps we would be able to see how tuition can potentially relieve stress instead. All that huge potential that tuition has to impact lives starts with tutors doing their very best. In this dynamically changing society, tutors need to commit themselves to continually upgrading their knowledge sets, reading up new materials from schools and other learning centres, mingling with young people to know them well, and adapting their teaching methods to our changing youngsters. Perhaps the Ministry should conduct workshops to update tutors with new curriculum or assist in helping us grow and become better educators too.The time and effort tutors put in needs to justify the cost of the lessons. Tuition is not meant to be an easy job, or an easy way out to a good life. Sadly speaking, there will always be tutors out there in it purely for the money. That’s where parents and students need their right and spend effort to find out more, to have in-depth conversations with tutors, to find out their ideas, beliefs and motivations, to get to know them. Likewise, the huge and branded tuition centres with their multiple branches are here to stay, and they will mostly be run like a business. As much as possible, Tutors should not be allowed to hide behind brand names. Request to sit in to classes. Speak to these tutors (some who have never been teachers but may not necessarily be bad tutors), understand them, make sure your child is not attending an ‘extra’ lesson, but a lesson that will potentially add as much value or more than classes in school. More importantly, observe if your child grows in character and values after attending these tuition classes. There are so many stereotypes and false impressions of the tuition industry that have shaped parents’ and students’ attitudes towards tutors and tuition. My hope is that parents, students and the public-at-large will step back and reevaluate these generalizations. It is important to remember that many tutors out there are still devoted teachers at heart and are not just profiteering ex-teachers. The“extra lessons” that we are excited to deliver are potentially able to impact the lives of students, just as powerfully as teacher can in the classroom, and may very well reduce students’ stress instead of adding to their burdens. While these lessons come at a ‘price’, look beyond the dollars and cents to understand the work and heart that goes into the two hours of tuition help that a young person receives. Finally, I hope this open letter encourages committed-teachers-turn-tutors out there to persevere and continue doing their best for young people. It is still a process of growth for many of us, so let us continue to learn from one another instead of viewing each other as mere competition. There are several successful tutor-mentors we can all learn from, and perhaps it is just about that small step we should take to ask. And to those dollar-focused tutors or tuition businesses, I think it’s time to reflect and rethink motivations. The education industry is unlike any other. There are young lives at stake, and it cannot just be about the money. This open letter was first published over at Darrell Tan's FaceBook wall on 18 January 2015. It is reproduced with permission. |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: “If you don’t study hard you will be cutting grass like this man here!!” Basic Idea #1: Set Our Students Free |
10 worrying trends in Singapore’s sports culture |
|---|
|
NMP Dr Ben Tan running along the green corridor. (Photo courtesy of Dr Ben Tan) By NMP Dr Ben Tan [Delivered in Parliament on 19 January 2015] |
|
Emerging gaps in Singapore’s sports participation Mr Deputy Speaker, I would like to declare my interests as President of the Singapore Sailing Federation (SingaporeSailing) and Sports Patron of the Singapore Disability Sports Council. In my clinic each day, I see lots of students from both our local and international schools, with their parents in tow. At some point during the consultation, the Singaporean parent will ask, “Dr Tan, can you write my son an MC [medical certificate] to excuse him from Physical Education (PE) and sports? At the same time, can you also ask the school to allow him to use the lift?” You’ll see a similar dialogue with pre-enlistees or their parents requesting for excuse letters or permanent downgrades. Many doctors will tell you that these are common scenarios. I see students from our international schools as well, such as the United World College (UWC) and the Singapore American School. No, it’s not the MC that they are after. Rather, they want me to sort out their injuries so that they can continue and finish the baseball season and be fully fit before the swimming season begins! It is very common for students from the international schools to do multiple sports – with full support from their parents. When I see such contrasting attitudes, it worries me. I am worried because this is just one manifestation of a systemic disease in Singapore’s sports participation framework. Singaporeans are pragmatic – we are goal oriented and we monitor closely our key performance indicators (KPIs). We pay close attention to what is tangible and measureable, i.e. medals and grades. Without fail, before each major Games, the media will ask me, as President of SingaporeSailing, what is our medal target and whether we are on track. Do they ever ask me whether our sailors truly enjoy sailing, whether they are familiar with Singapore’s rich maritime history, whether our sailors see sailing as a lifelong pursuit, whether they are inculcated with the desired values, or whether we have sailors who sail for reasons other than medals? I wish they did, because those are the pertinent questions that matter much more than the medals. I would say that the Singapore National Olympic Council, Ministry of Community, Culture and Youth, and Sport Singapore have done a thorough job of reviewing our High Performance Systems over the years – from the Sports Excellence (SPEX) Programme in the ’90s, to the Committee on Sporting Singapore (CoSS), Project 08/12 Go For Gold and the Olympic Pathway Programme, to the current High Performance Sports (HPS) Programme. Through such comprehensive initiatives, our elite athletes have progressed to the point where we are winning Olympic medals, and last year our sailors won Singapore’s first two Youth Olympic Games gold medals. On the academic KPI, we have done exceedingly well, topping the International Baccalaureate exams for the fourth consecutive year and achieving the best showing at the ‘O’ levels in 20 years. What we need to do now is to pay more attention to mass participation, where the results and benefits are less tangible. Yes, we had Sports for Life in the ’90s, and the current Vision2030 master plan, which adopts a more holistic outlook, has introduced ActiveSG. Nevertheless, there appears to be worrying trends emerging in our local sports culture. I will highlight ten of them: 1. Singaporeans are not exercising enough. The 2011 National Sports Participation Survey revealed that only 42 per cent of Singaporeans exercised at least once a week, down from 50 per cent in 2005. Compare this with Finland’s enviable 76 per cent in 2005. Participation levels fell amongst Singaporeans below 60 years of age, particularly those in their teens, which fell, by 16 per cent, to 68 per cent. This does not bode well for the future. On top of that, blue-collared workers recorded a larger decline in sports participation compared to professionals, managers, executives and businessmen (PMEBs). 2. Too many of our young are not enjoying sports. When I ask my patients from the local schools if they look forward to their school’s Sports Day, I get a cynical look. When I asked a patient from UWC the same question, she said, “We all love it – it’s so much fun!” She continues effusively, “Sports Day is run over three whole days and everybody participates and gets to try multiple sports. There’s aquatics, games, and athletics. We are rotated from one station to another, and end up trying a lot of things. You don’t need to be good, and it is do-able for everyone!” When young Singaporeans have a pleasant introduction to sports and physical activity, the exercise habit is likely to continue into adulthood and beyond. We need to review how we approach physical activity promotion across various groups, especially the young. We may have the best-laid policies and plans, but let’s see how we can do better in bringing these into fruition. 3. Our motivation for being physically active is questionable. Do we do it because it is simply the natural thing to do, or because it is part of our culture and tradition? Or do we participate in sports to accumulate Co-Curricular Activity (CCA) points or notch a higher level of attainment under the Leadership, Enrichment, Achievement, Participation and Service (LEAPS) 2.0 framework; for direct school admission (DSA); or for a shorter Basic Military Training? In our international schools, the norm is to participate in at least one sport. Many participate or compete in multiple sports despite the fact that the international schools do not award CCA points. In fact, do we really treat sports as truly ‘co’-curricular? In January 2000, the Ministry of Education (MOE) acknowledged the integral role of co-curricular activities in achieving the desired outcomes of education by replacing the term “extra-curricular” with “co-curricular”. It is work in progress, and I look forward to more and more Singaporean parents – and consequently their children – adopting the right mentality, participating in CCAs for the right reasons. 4. There are not enough opportunities to learn sports. Again, citing our international schools as an example, there are ample opportunities for their students – for each sport on the comprehensive menu of sports that they offer, there are teams of various levels, including beginners. Another one of my patients from an international school wasn’t much of a basketballer when he enrolled in the school, so he simply joined the novice team. As he got better, he progressed to team C then B and eventually ended up in team A. Contrast that with our local schools where parents have told me that if you are not good enough for the school team, you are not offered a chance to participate in that sport at all. Take sailing for example. In the past – there were multiple entry-points into sailing. It didn’t matter if you didn’t start sailing in primary school – you still had another chance to try out sailing in secondary school, and if you missed that, there’s still junior college and polytechnic. Now, apart from the international schools, hardly any local school in Singapore will offer to teach sailing – they accept only ready-made sailors. I find this disappointing because a significant number of national sailors did a credible job of representing Singapore even though they started sailing relatively late. Stanley Tan and Stanley Chan got introduced to sailing through their junior college. Stanley Tan went on to represent Singapore at two Olympic Games while Stanley Chan is a multiple Asian and Southeast Asian (SEA) Games representative and medalist. Despite such success stories, their junior college has since shelved their sailing programme. If our schools do not undertake to accept new entrants to various sports, there will be no future Stanley Tans or Stanley Chans. A Football Association of Singapore (FAS) survey of 100 primary schools earlier this year found that nearly one in two children wanted to play football, but only 5.9 per cent of boys and 1.6 per cent of girls were given a chance to. 5. Are our schools too focused on winning medals, at the expense of sports participation? Even school teams face the threat of being scrapped simply because they can’t achieve a podium finish. The 14 Dec 2014 issue of The Sunday Times cited a veteran football coach who said, “My principal said the football team will be scrapped if we don’t reach the nationals tournament.” Is winning the only thing that matters to our schools? While policies have shifted, how can we help the policy implementers put it right? 6. Singaporeans are struggling with their fitness levels. A lecturer at one of our polytechnics estimates that 70 per cent of poly students fail their National Physical Fitness Award (NAPFA) test. Another lecturer at a different polytechnic cited a failure rate of 60–70 per cent. Pre-enlistees struggle to get fit for national service and many NSmen struggle with their Individual Physical Proficiency Test (IPPT) as well. The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF)’s recent simplification of the IPPT format and increased flexibility in the IPPT Preparatory Training (IPT) are steps in the right direction, as keeping the status quo will not yield better results. 7. Reduced fitness levels in turn lead to increased obesity rates and a heavier burden of chronic diseases. Singapore’s prevalence of obesity rose from 6.9 per cent in 2004 to 10.8 per cent in 2010 while diabetes rose from 8.2 per cent to 11.3 per cent in the same period. 8. Our sports events can be more veteran-friendly. One is never too old to participate in sport and there is ample medical evidence that one can benefit from exercise even if one starts late. What message are we sending when Singapore’s biggest marathon offers older runners only one age category, i.e. the above-40 masters category? Lumping a 60-year-old runner together with a 40-year-old in the same competitive category can only discourage the 60-year-old even before the race has started. When I was at the International Sailing Federation meeting last November, there was naturally and understandably a lot of emphasis on youth sailing and how to attract young people to the sport. Hence I was impressed with the insight of a windsurfing official who reminded the meeting that, in fact, the biggest market for windsurfing is actually the older age groups. 9. The physically challenged are still facing significant barriers to sports participation. For the disabled, sport offers a beacon of hope and is an important avenue for reintegrating into society. Desmond Tong lost his right leg in a motorcycle accident in 1999. After the accident, his life went into a tailspin – he dropped out of university, was ostracized by his friends, and became depressed and suicidal. Through sports, he has since picked himself up and has been training diligently to do Singapore proud in the archery event of the ASEAN Para Games to be held in Singapore this December. His main obstacle now is not his missing leg, but the fact that he does not have a 70-metre range to practise at after he finishes work on weekdays. Jason Chee, who lost both legs and his left arm while serving on a Navy ship in 2012, now represents Singapore in table tennis. Together with his doubles partner Darren Chua, he won a bronze medal for Singapore at the ASEAN Para Games last year. Jason is now training hard for the next ASEAN Para Games. What is his number one obstacle? Jason says, “Transport to and from my training venue.” Dr William Tan, a long-time advocate for challenged athletes, added that apart from permanent training venues and transportation, another major obstacle faced is funding. Dr Tan shared, “The financial support from the existing carding system is meagre for challenged athletes – any financial support received goes mostly to transportation costs.” 10. The struggle for recreational space, especially for sports, is escalating. Agencies like the National Parks Board, Urban Redevelopment Authority, Public Utilities Board, and Singapore Land Authority have been very progressive in optimizing our shared spaces – as a result, we witness water sports in the heart of our Central Business District in Marina Bay itself, beautiful running tracks along our waterways, recreational activities on various reservoirs, and ciclovia (the closing of a section of Orchard Road to cars one evening a month in favour of pedestrians). In a highly-urbanized Singapore, there will always be challenges when it comes to sharing spaces. Take, for example, the constant struggle between cyclists and other road users or pedestrians. Last November, Mr Eric Khoo, the organizer of the HolyCrit cycling race in Tanglin Halt explained that he did not seek permits from the authorities primarily because an estimated $25,000 to $30,000 in compliance costs would be needed. The sailing community could not continue its proud tradition of the popular Round Island Race because permits would not be granted. Maritime security and safety are certainly valid concerns, but we need to push the boundaries and take a leaf from others – if other countries were as conservative as us, there would be no Sydney Hobart Race or boating activities in the busy Sydney Harbour or San Francisco Bay. Each of these 10 points represents a major obstacle to Singaporeans adopting an active lifestyle. Collectively, they form a formidable barrier to sports participation. Each of these issues fall under the purview of a few agencies – this is reminiscent of the fishball stick anecdote that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong shared at the last National Day Rally. I hope we won’t need a sports equivalent of the Municipal Services Office to systematically address these multifaceted challenges. But let us not wait till our obesity levels catch up with the west, or for our healthcare costs to creep further up, or for the pipelines to our national teams to run dry before we strengthen our resolve to address these emerging gaps in Singapore’s sports participation. This is reproduced with permission from Dr Ben Tan, a Non-constituency MP. Note that The Domain of Singapore Tutoring Experts is not politically affiliated with any party/organization. |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: Parents sending kids for ‘sports tuition’ “If you don’t study hard you will be cutting grass like this man here!!” Opinion: Is our education system failing us? |
Basic Idea #1: Set Our Students Free |
|---|
|
By 2econdsight As a response to Prof Kishore’s 2014: Year of Big Ideas, here is the first Basic Idea. It is fashionable for politicians, in particular, to make rousing references to how we must nurture our youth. Our youth is the future of our nation. The past is important. But it is also dead and gone. But the future’s there for anyone to change. What’s doggone certain are a) like it or not, it will surely come and b) changes will bring us the future even as the future will bring us changes. Idea #1 is informed by Roosevelt’s assertion. In fact, it is our sacred duty to do so as adults. But there is a small problem. Why must ‘we’ be the only ones to build? Why not ‘they’? After all, it is their future we are talking about, isn’t it? Now, of all the changes that the original team of PAP leaders did, there is one that I never understood. The rationale behind the policy and the context within which it was decided are understandable. But it’s nonetheless puzzling. No longer discussed and long forgotten, it was the policy of forbidding our students from participating actively in politics and socio-political matters. The policy was borne of the riotous days of the student protests. If I recall correctly, the 1950’s hyper student activism of The Chinese High School (now Hwa Chong) and Chung Cheng High was legendary. What our Singapore students did would put the recent Taiwanese Sunflower and HK Yellow Umbrella civic disobedience in the shade. Just google ‘Singapore Chinese middle school riots’ for more details. No, I am not advocating that we return to those heady, violent days of youthful activism. And it is most certainly not because of what recently occurred in HongKong and Taiwan that I have puzzled over the matter. Reading up on Singapore modern history decades back. I had always thought it ironic that of all the people to call for neutralizing the voice and activism of students, it was the once-in-many-lifetimes team of LKY, Goh Keng Swee, S Rajaratnam and Toh Chin Chye et al. My questions were; – Where did they first meet?
– When did their political philosophy germinate?
– How did they first dip their feet into political activities? .
The short answer is: In the universities, as undergraduates. Why were they able to stick through the many baptisms of fire? Amongst other reasons, it must be that their ideals were formed, forged and fortified by the rush of youth and youthful, never-say-die-must-try perseverance. Sheer will and grit to sell their ideals and sacrifice their all for the greater good of their fellowmen. The depth of such idealism cannot be replicated in men and women, with their youth long gone. The breadth of such ideals cannot be conceived by minds narrowed by too many failures or successes, both of which serve mostly to circumscribe the boundaries of the merely possible. The freshness of insights can never be spontaneously recreated in the lab of adult experience. If we cannot solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them (Einstein), then it’s onus upon us to encourage and also look towards that other level of thinking to whom the thinking capabilities and future belong. Let us free them to listen to their own heartbeats, to march to their own drumbeats. It is quite beyond me why the PAP team that went on to build up the better Singapore we used to know with ideals and camaraderie fashioned during their student days would cut off that basic human right and the environment that rallied them together in the first place. Therefore, my Basic Idea #1 is Set Our Students’ Free. To do so, we must jettison at the earliest possible any and all the legal encumbrances that are currently holding back our students and our young from thinking and acting freely to discuss and push for what they see to be their own future in the making. I call for the timely dismantling of a mistaken system that has reduced and cowed our young into mostly self-centred, self-absorbed, self-seeking cry-babies – with too few exceptions. Instead of redirecting our top young minds to focus on merely succeeding as mainly productive economic units, let us free them, dare them to… Let the disappointments pass
Let the laughter fill your glass
Let your illusions last until they shatter
Whatever you might hope to find
Among the thoughts that crowd your mind
There won’t be many that ever really matter
....
And remember to be kind
When the pain of another will serve you to remind
That there are those who feel themselves exiled
On whom the fortune never smiled
And upon whose life the heartache has been piled
… And when you’ve found another soul
Who sees into your own
Take good care of each other
(The Only Child, J Browne) The future is theirs, we cannot build it for them. Building them for their future starts with allowing them their right to conceive the kind of future they think, dream possible. We certainly can – indeed, must – stand aside, cheer them on to harness their energy and exuberance, their imagination and idealism for a world better than what we leave for them. J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, 2005 This post was first published over at the 2econdsight blog on 19 January 2015. It is reproduced with permission. |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: Mixed Feelings Amongst Singaporean Youths |
Guide to studying medicine in Australia |
|---|
The title says it all; a generous soul going by the online moniker of Matsuri (who by the way is doing a degree in Medicine in Aussieland) created this very informative post to provide a leg up of sorts for aspiring doctors:
|
|
" Recognition of the medical degree in Singapore by Singapore Medical Council. I believe most people would have googled the list already but anyways here's the LIST. This is quite a transitional period for Australian medical schools because most of them are changing their degrees from MBBS/BMed (bachelor's) to MD (doctorate). Just getting into any one of the schools listed in the schedule would be pretty safe. Singapore Medical Council (SMC) does take some time to update the name of the degree but they are all the same thing. Length of study: Graduate programs - 4 years. Undergrad - 5 to 6 years. School fees: (2015)
A few schools popular amongst Singaporeans:
- University of South Wales (UNSW): AUD 415,000 for 6 yrs
- Monash: AUD 325,000 (65k a yr) x 5 yrs
- University of Tasmania (UTAS): AUD 53k a yr x 5 yrs
- University of Adelaide: AUD 63k a yr x 6 yrs
- University of Newcastle: AUD 47k a yr x 5 yrs You get the rough idea. Living expenses: Bulk of the expenses come from rent, which ranges from roughly around 150 AUD a week to near 300 AUD a week, depending on where you stay and the facilities etc. Eating out is very expensive so cooking your own meals can save you a lot of money, plus know where and when to get your groceries and you might be able to get them cheaper than what you can get in Singapore. Prepare at least 200-300 AUD on top of your rent for food, transport and misc. That's quite a safe estimate. Entry pathway: Heard of polytechnic students entering medical school in Australia. Not impossible but mostly JC students. Also possible to enter through their foundation programs. Last I checked, entry requirements range from BBB to straight As, of course some with/without interview or some other tests. Check with IDP/AUG. What you will study: Most medical schools in Australia have been using problem-based learning (PBL) for a while but I think some schools still use that traditional lecture and tutorial style of teaching. My thoughts: I was a JC student, never attended university in Singapore so I can't really compare the two methods of teaching but PBL felt more applicable to each topic. For example, each week, we will be given a scenario such as Mr A presented with etc etc symptoms, then we are given test results and medical history etc etc. We then have to think of 'learning targets/outcomes' related to everything mentioned in the scenario, whether it was anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, drug stuff to medical ethics, professional skills etc. After that, we get a couple of lectures to guide us but the bulk of learning comes from our own learning and research from books, internet etc. Finally, we have another few sessions to share with everyone what we have found and to kinda ensure everyone has achieved the 'learning outcomes' before moving on to another scenario. The downside is that it gets rather messy because you will be jumping from one system to another system but PBL emphasises on spiral learning, where you keep adding new knowledge to your existing broad-based knowledge. Medical schools in general follow such a general format:
Pre-clinical years (year 1 and 2 for undergrad): You will be based full time at the university, learning about anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, whatnot. A lot of emphasis on communication and patient safety. You would also get perhaps a handful of clinical sessions at the hospitals to practise your history taking skills, physical examinations skills on real patients, of course under supervision of a doctor. Research year (year 3): Some universities such as UNSW have such a thing. Not too sure about that but as far as I am aware they spend their third year doing research. While for some other 6-year schools, the third year might not be spent on research. Clinical years (year 3-5/6): Yes, you will be studying full time in hospitals. You will have rotations for a few weeks, before moving onto the next rotation. This also means that you might have to go from one clinical school (hospital) to the other clinical school, depending on the location. Clinical years exist to turn medical students into functional junior doctors that are capable of working in a hospital so it's all about learning how the system works etc. After graduation: You will need to do an internship/housemanship to be fully registered as a doctor in Australia/Singapore. Coming back to Singapore is not a problem now because of the high demand for doctors (esp overseas-trained Singaporeans) in the new hospitals. On the other hand, it is slightly more tricky in Australia. The internship crisis has been going on for years; fact, I have heard some people saying that it has going on since the 90s. The government just doesn't guarantee the internationals any internship places but many have often said that everyone who applied for internship will eventually get one. There is also a Commonwealth Medical Internship thing initiated by the federal government, specifically for internationals for them to complete their internship in Australia, but they would have to repay with a year of service in a regional/rural area. If possible, get the Australian Medical Council (AMC) registration first before coming back to Singapore. It makes more sense because SMC registration is much easier to get than AMC's. Best is to specialise before coming back to Singapore, well you would be at least offered a position of an associate consultant rather than a houseman. One thing to take note is also the different types of registration given by SMC. Read it HERE. Ultimately, you will want a full registration in Singapore but upon first returning to Singapore, you will be an IMG (international medical grad), as such you will have to work under supervision in a public hospital until you are given a full registration. There isn't a definite answer as to how long it will take for you to gain full registration. Back to Australia, one thing to take note is that there aren't a lot of specialisation spots, especially for internationals but then again, it is a huge country, and as long as you are not stubborn enough to want to stay only in Sydney or Melbourne, there will be training spots I believe. Some thoughts:
- First entered med school having many ideals
- Passion doesn't pay for your degree
- Nonetheless, don't enter medicine just because all the medical schools everywhere made it so damn hard for you to enter
- Don't enter for the money either, you will command a decent pay yes but not a sky high one
- Be mindful of your actions and thoughts, be aware of the impact of your actions/words on others and aware of the thoughts going through your mind. Med schools can have so many lectures teaching their students to be excellent communicators but only a handful of them are mindful of their actions and thoughts.
- You will see patients that look just like the average uncle/auntie out there, but only have a few months to live
- You will also see old people with tons of diseases and still fighting on
- You will then realise how fortunate you are to be healthy
- You will also realise how you never had the greatest problem on earth With regards to studying in Australia, even though it is a developed country, it is still a huge country and hence healthcare isn't that well distributed there so it is definitely not what you see in Singapore. If you didn't get a chance to study locally, it is not that bad an idea to consider Australia/UK to broaden your perspective because it has broadened mine, not just in terms of healthcare but everything from the expectations of the people to how it is to live outside Singapore." THANK YOU MATSURI FOR ALLOWING US TO REPRODUCE YOUR POST. The Czar (Site Founder) Dated 23 January 2015 |
|
YOU MAY WISH TO READ: Don't want to study in SIM, must I retake my 'A' Levels? Heading to the USA or Canada with only 'O'/'A' Levels for further study-possible options Applying for Med School: BMAT matters very much |

















